Quiet words in a fiery climate By Diaa Al-Shammari -Iraq
By Diaa Al-Shammari -Iraq- Translated from Arabic by Ibrahim Ebeid
Quiet words in a fiery climate
By Diaa Al-Shammari -Iraq-
Translated from Arabic by Ibrahim Ebeid.
The military escalation that hangs over the regional arena, after Israel carried out large-scale military operations against military targets, scientific and nuclear research centers, first- and second-line military leaders and atomic scientists, and an Iranian response with missile bulbs and drones, was expected since the Iranian regime began to deviate from the controls of regularity that was drawn for its role in the heart of the Arab world through its incursion (the collection of Ibn Haram’s sons) in many Arab countries, and the practice of all forms Structural sabotage in Arab society by dismantling national structures in the arenas where it works destructive shovels to hollow it out and weaken the elements of its immunity, achieving what the Zionist enemy was unable to accomplish in terms of fragmentation and demographic change in an apparent targeting to strike the national identity of the countries in which the Iranian regime practiced all forms of political, economic and social consequences.
The mullahs’ regime thought that its incursion into the Arab depth, under American auspices and regardless of Zionism, would make it a speculative partner in sharing influence with the Zionist-American alliance, ignoring that this alliance deliberately invested in it to strike the foundations of Arab national security. All of them invested in the reality of Arab weakness, after the national exposure, whose repercussions were severe on national security after the siege of Iraq, aggression and occupation, and the overthrow of its national regime.
Had it not been for this exposure, which was achieved by all the forces that conspired against Iraq and formed an unholy alliance against it, the atmosphere, waters and Arab land would not have been permissible for the exchange of messages with fire between yesterday’s allies, starting with “Iran-Gate” and reaching today’s opponents, who are united by a position of hostility to Arabism. At the same time, they are divided by competition over the size of quotas and the struggle for influence, all at the expense of the Arab nation and its vital interests.
From our national position, which is governed by the law of absolute hostility to the Zionist project, with all its embodiments and characters, we were, are, and will continue to consider that the conflict with it is existential. Every conflict with those who are hostile to the nation from other backgrounds remains without this contradiction, even if it is a hostile contradiction.
This applies to the Iranian regime, which has positioned itself as an enemy of the nation. When it presented itself as the owner of an expansionist project, it did not hide its ambitions, considering its incursion a control of four Arab capitals. It declared openly and unequivocally that Baghdad would return to its historic capital, the former capital of the Persian Empire.
If Iran is subjected to this scale of destructive Zionist bombardment of its facilities, and the killing of its military leaders and atomic scientists, then what brought the situation to this level of exposure that enabled Israel to undermine it is how the Iranian regime presented itself since the change in Iran and the mullahs’ seizure of power in it.
If Iran had responded to Arab calls, first from Iraq, it would have established good-neighborly relations based on non-interference in each other’s internal affairs.
– Even if the Iranian regime did not continue the American facilities, to enable it to Iraq after the withdrawal of American forces under the pressure of the national resistance,
– Even if Iraq remained in full force and military, economic, and tactical capabilities,
Was Israel, no matter how capable it was militarily, able to conquer the skies of Iran and strike deep into it? Of course, that wouldn’t have happened.
That is why Iran, like others who conspired against Iraq, is now paying late bills, and they are the ones who did not learn from the wisdom that “they were devoured when the white bull was eaten.”
The Zionist entity … If he uses Iran’s failure to acquire a nuclear weapon as a pretext to declare war on it, it is not because he fears that its regime will acquire a nuclear weapon, but because he fears entering the region into a nuclear arms race, and he realizes that the next day Iran possesses an atomic bomb, the Arabs will walk this path
This is what the enemy commanders did not hide by saying:
Israel would initiate a war if the Arabs had a nuclear weapon. Didn’t you bomb the Tammuz reactor in Iraq when the Iranian regime was unable to do so during the war in 1981? ؟
We are well aware that Palestine has never been a national issue for the Iranian people, wherever the description applies, unlike what it is for the Arab nation. Still, it entered the realm of the Palestinian cause, becoming a focus of political investment. For this investment, it invested in military and militia formations to implement the agenda of the Iranian project. Even though the price offered by some of the sons of this nation was high for joining this project, it was for different reasons.
In dealing with Zionist aggression, we do not put the position on it under the rubric of condemnation, because we have not and will not recognize an entity that is basically not legitimate. Rather, it is an entity based on rape, and produced by a balance of power that prevailed at a moment of intensification of international and regional conflict, on the nation and in it.
Accordingly, a conviction is valid when the party to be convicted has a legitimate character and whose conduct exceeds the limits of public international law and international conventions governing relations between States.
Therefore, the position of his aggression in any direction occurred, but he was confronted by all available means and possibilities. At the moment of the high temperature of the confrontation between yesterday’s friends and today’s opponents, if Iran wants to respond to the destructive bombardment it is experiencing, its way is not to launch salvos of missiles or some drones; this is psychologically relieving. Still, it does not make an adjustment in the reality of the situation, which is imbalanced in favor of the Zionist enemy. The absolute support it receives from America, which plays the role of strategic leadership, to control the region and its resources, and will continue to work to contain Iran and introduce arrangements Its regional system, which it is working to form, but rather to remove the reasons that made the Arab nation with its popular base in a state of hostility with Iran.
And ABB that:
Iran should abandon its hostile project against the Arab nation, under the name of exporting the revolution, which was not an export of fragmentation, sabotage, and demographic change.
When the Iranian regime recalculates and considers that the interest of Iran and the interest of its peoples is to weave the best political and economic relations with neighboring Arab and regional countries, you will see that the Arab nation is the best friend and best ally to face the major challenges that threaten Arab national security and Iran’s national security.
This is how the response to Zionist aggression is, and this is how the victory for the Palestinian cause is.
Or… Political speeches, no matter how high their tactical ceilings, will not deter aggression.
Confronting aggression and the Zionist expansion project requires an Arab position that rejects, resists, and mobilizes the nation’s potential in the face of the enemy, and requires an Iranian initiative that rises to the limit of the strategic position. This is in contrast to what the ruling authority in Iran has been doing since the mullahs came to power, and by abandoning its hostile stance towards Arabism and opening a new page of good-neighborly relations.
Will Iran make a strategic shift in its relations with the Arab world?
